Historical Role Play : Gettysburg Battle Biography Movie
Teacher Name: Daniel Cox
Student Name:     ________________________________________
CATEGORY	4- Sergeant Major	3- Platoon Sergeant	2- Sergeant	1- Private
Accuracy - 30%	Historical information was accurate and in correct chronological order.  Character information was correct and complete. Details of battle were accurate. Main battle events in correct order	Almost all historical information appeared to be accurate and in chronological order. Battle details minimally inaccurate.	Most of the historical information was accurate and in chronological order. More flaws in battle details. Two or more points were inaccurate.	Very little of the historical information was accurate and/or in chronological order. Only basic elements of the battle were correct. Battle strategies incorrect.
Role - 15%	Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were consistently in character.	Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were often in character.	Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were sometimes in character.	Point-of-view, arguments, and solutions proposed were rarely in character.
Required Elements - 15%	Student reported more than 4 key events prior to and following the Battle that their character contributed.	Student reported 4 key events prior to and after the Battle that their character contributed.	Student reported on 3 key events prior to and after the Battle that their character contributed.	Student reported less than 3 key events prior to and after the Battle that their character contributed.
Content - 10%	Demonstrates a significant understanding of the character and biographical information.	Shows a good understanding of the character.  Does have some gaps in information but overall presentation flows and character is well presented.	Weakness in the information gathered and the character history lacks flow.  Missing several key elements to biography.	Little to no proficiency with the biographical information.  Major flaws in biographical timeline, obviously little effort done in gathering information.
Persuasiveness - 20%	Students presented clear, concise information. Argument validated point of view.	Makes conclusion. Still room for interpretation. Not as convincing an argument	Missing key elements. Lacks strong conclusion to sway opinion to team point of view.	Failed to reach a conclusive point. Not persuasive. Lacked focus and direction needed to make points.
Product Quality - 10%	Students movie was consistent in volume and speech pattern.  Transistions were well thought out and smooth.  Exceptional effort shows in final product.	Mostly consistent volume and speech.  Slight flaws and hesitations with transitions.  Effort noticiable but not fully developed in final product.	Noticable and frequent changes in volume and speech.  Transitions flawed but presentation still has flow.  Minimal effort reflected in final product.	Students movie had large flucuations in volume and speech.  Transitions were jerky and lacked consistency throughout.  Sloppy, almost non-existent effort in final product.
				Edited by Daniel Cox based on template by Rubistar.com
Date Created: Feb 29, 2008 10:56 am (CST)